<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WebDev77&#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webdev77.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webdev77.com</link>
	<description>WebDev77, your online source for news, comments and articles on Web Hosting, Internet marketing, SEO techniques and Web development and design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Internal SEO (I)</title>
		<link>http://www.webdev77.com/internal-seo-i/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webdev77.com/internal-seo-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 01:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bogdan Enache</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines News & SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdev77.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Purpose
The purpose of internal SEO is to optimize your web pages for ranking well in organic SERP. However without performing additional external SEO, you should know that no matter how well you optimize your website internally, you will not rank in the first pages for highly competitive keywords. With internal SEO you will rank higher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Purpose</h3>
<p>The purpose of internal SEO is to optimize your web pages for ranking well in organic SERP. However without performing additional external SEO, you should know that no matter how well you optimize your website internally, you will not rank in the first pages for highly competitive keywords. With internal SEO you will rank higher on less competitive terms searches compared with search results with no internal SEO at all.</p>
<p>Internal SEO requires modifications of your web pages, so you need to be familiar with the web development technologies used to develop your website or you can ask someone who knows how to do these modifications. In case your website is still in the development phase, make sure that the programmers team follows the search engine optimization rules presented.</p>
<p>Internal SEO focuses on the following areas of a website / webpage:</p>
<h3>Web Page Content</h3>
<p>Content is (still) king. Original, rich content is the search engines&#8217; robots preferred &#8220;food&#8221;. It&#8217;s logical that if you want to rank high in SERP for specific keywords you need to have relevant content for those keywords. But forget about search engines robots! The main reason you should have interesting content is your visitors; the robots will not buy your products and read your articles and they will not link back to your website from other websites. Your visitors will do that! So, your SEO efforts regarding content should focus on:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Page Titles</strong> &#8211; The title of a webpage should be relevant to page&#8217;s content. Don&#8217;t use the same title for all your website pages;</li>
<li><strong>META Tags</strong> &#8211; These are HTML tags used in &#8220;the past&#8221; to provide information about the web pages. Google and other search engines disregard them, but there are a few search engines that still use them in ranking the pages. And with search engines continuously changing their algorithms, you never know when they might become important again. The most important meta tags SEO wise are: name=&#8221;keywords&#8221; and name=&#8221;description&#8221;;</li>
<li><strong>Format Tags</strong> &#8211; The text format tags like (bold, italic, h1, h2, h3) are used for titles, sub-titles or to highlight a word or an idea. Search engines know this and add more weight to those words or phrases;</li>
<li><strong>ALT Tags for Images</strong> &#8211; For an image, the ALT tag represents a description of that image that will appear in case the image source is no longer available or the visitor is using a text-only web browser (i.e. Lynx). Provide a description for all the images on your web pages;</li>
<li><strong>Keywords Density</strong> &#8211; Write original content, but make sure you have a good keywords density. The recommended average keyword density is 3-5%. Remember to count singular and plural versions as the same word. Start by writing for your visitors and edit the text afterwards so that it has the right keywords density. If you can not manage to get your keywords in, then they might not be the right keywords for your web page;</li>
<li><strong>Links Neighborhood </strong>- Some search engine weight the text surrounding a link with greater importance so links inside the paragraphs are more relevant than, let&#8217;s say, links in the footer navigation of the page.</li>
</ul>
<p>To be continued &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webdev77.com/internal-seo-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2008 SEO Trends (II)</title>
		<link>http://www.webdev77.com/2008-seo-trends-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webdev77.com/2008-seo-trends-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 04:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bogdan Enache</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines News & SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad fatigue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user behavior]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdev77.com/2008-seo-trends-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Breed of Internauts
In 2008 SEO Trends (I) we looked at the market for SEO services from the firm’s perspective. Let us now turn the camera and focus on the Internet users because they are in fact the final “consumers” of the search engines optimization efforts. Understanding consumers’ behavior is critical to any marketing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>The New Breed of Internauts</h3>
<p>In <a href="http://www.webdev77.com/2008-seo-trends-i/">2008 SEO Trends (I)</a> we looked at the market for SEO services from the firm’s perspective. Let us now turn the camera and focus on the Internet users because they are in fact the final “consumers” of the search engines optimization efforts. Understanding consumers’ behavior is critical to any marketing campaigns and don’t be surprised to find out that there is a new breed of Internauts roaming the Internet.</p>
<p>There are many aspects to be looked at when analyzing the behavior of people surfing the Internet; we will focus on two that are relevant to our case: searching patterns and ad fatigue. When looking at the search engines market leader, we see that Google’s current rate of growth is on a downward trend. I’m not saying that they are not growing; I’m only saying that the rate at which they grow has slowed down. Google is experiencing lower click rates on search results ads and especially on their AdSense partner sites. Not only the click-through-rates (CTR) are lower than the previous years but advertisers are also complaining of having lower conversion rates too. And the lowest conversion rates come from advertisements on social media sites. Why is this happening? There are a few reasons why:</p>
<ul>
<li>Not everybody surfing the web wants to buy products, and especially not the kids watching movies on YouTube.</li>
<li>Ad fatigue. People now know that the top SERP placed results are ads and don’t want to click on them because they’ve seen enough commercials already. Have you wondered why so many customizations are available for AdSense? Google is trying hard to blend their ads in partner sites so that people don&#8217;t think they are clicking ads, but there are really no more possible tricks to combat ad fatigue.</li>
<li>Ad clickers are now Ad publishers. People click on AdSense. Publishers talk too much about AdSense. People now apply for AdSense. People once in the market for clicks are now sellers and hoping for clicks.</li>
</ul>
<p>The searching patterns have changed also. People usually search for the first three-four months. People learn about new web sites and bookmark the ones with great content. People stay on those sites. People now type directly the website name in the address bar (or select it form the bookmarks list) or search for the name of the website.</p>
<h3>SEO Changes</h3>
<p>The major trend with Internet marketing today is the rush to get some visibility. The problem is that sometimes the desire to be ranked on top overshadows relevancy. And Internet users don’t like that, because they go to the search engines to find something relevant. So I reckon for 2008, the search engines’ “fight” with spammers and black-hat SEO will continue and the ranking algorithms will be further tweaked to get the most relevant pages on top. However there will be some tweaking that is not spam-related but user behavior driven. With the new breed of Internauts surfing the web and the ad fatigue, the need for more relevant pages will grow. But ranking algorithms already use web page content relevancy, incoming links from relevant web sites, etc. so is there anything else that can be used?</p>
<p>There is still some data that can further improve results relevancy, data like: time spent on a page, user’s bookmarks, direct visits, CTR levels through SERPs, bounce rates, etc. The problem is that this kind of data is hard to collect. There are though ways to collect it and we speculate that one of the reasons behind Yahoo pushing their tool bar and Google offering free analytics might be just that. They are trying to collect, understand and map the data to users’ behavior. As more data is gathered and processed, link popularity will become less important in ranking results.</p>
<p>But, until that happens, the power and number of incoming links will still play a major role in the search engine optimization techniques. One of the factors that are expected to gain more weight in determining the strength of a link will be the text surrounding the link. Links inside the text with relevant keywords around them will have more “juice”.</p>
<h3>Summary</h3>
<p>Despite the fact that economy will slowdown the need for visibility and better ROI will possible make SEO to go mainstream in 2008. Regardless of when, integration of online and traditional marketing will be inevitable; SEO will merge with the “marketing department” or at least the two services will be offered as a bundle.</p>
<p><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webdev77.com/2008-seo-trends-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Tips and Tricks 1</title>
		<link>http://www.webdev77.com/seo-tips-and-tricks-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webdev77.com/seo-tips-and-tricks-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bogdan Enache</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines News & SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avoid duplicate content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meta tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplemental index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips and tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdev77.com/2008/02/10/seo-tips-and-tricks-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Duplicate Content
This is the first blog entry from the SEO Tips and Tricks series and today we will discuss about duplicate content. Duplicate content refers to large matching blocks of content within the same website or across different websites. The search engines are trying to keep their results&#8217; relevancy high so they don&#8217;t want duplicate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Duplicate Content</h3>
<p>This is the first blog entry from the SEO Tips and Tricks series and today we will discuss about duplicate content. Duplicate content refers to large matching blocks of content within the same website or across different websites. The search engines are trying to keep their results&#8217; relevancy high so they don&#8217;t want duplicate content in their databases. There&#8217;s no point in having and showing pages with the same text. It doesn&#8217;t help the user and it occupies disk space. Webmasters and SEOs should minimize similar content in order to avoid search engines penalties.</p>
<p>The &#8220;penalties&#8221; for having duplicate content are not harmful to the website, but are harmful to your position in the SERPs, because  while the website itself will not be penalized or de-indexed, the pages will duplicate content will be moved to the supplemental index and will not be shown in the search engine results pages. How exactly do the search engines&#8217; duplicate content filters work is not known, but is assumed that: the crawling date, the authority of the website and the links pointing from one website to the other are taken into consideration when determining which website has the &#8220;original&#8221; content.</p>
<h3>Tips and Tricks</h3>
<p><b>Duplicate content within the website.</b><br />
There are some steps you can take to prevent duplicate content from appearing on your website:</p>
<ul>
<li><b>Duplicate pages</b>. You decided to create a printer-friendly version of each page so your visitors can print the information in an organized fashion. Great added value! However, the printer-friendly version is considered duplicate content. There are two ways to avoid that:
<ol>
<li>Add a ‘noindex&#8217; meta tag to your printer-friendly versions of the pages.<br />
<blockquote><p> &lt;meta name=&#8221;robots&#8221; content=&#8221;noindex, nofollow&#8221; /&gt;</p></blockquote>
</li>
<li>Put all the versions in a specific folder and use robots.txt to disallow search engines&#8217; bots to index those pages.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li><b>Minimize boilerplate repetition</b>. By providing a link to a page that has the text rather than repeating it on every page. However, sometimes it is desired to be able to showcase the text (i.e. testimonials), so here&#8217;s a nice trick to do it: take a &#8220;picture&#8221; of the text and display the text on each of the pages as a picture (.gif, .jpg, etc.).
        </li>
<li><b>Duplicate URLs</b>. Usually, to access the website, we can use both the www version of the URL as well as the non-www version of the URL. For the search engines, the two URLs are &#8220;different&#8221;, so that&#8217;s duplicate content. SEO wise that&#8217;s bad also; you are dividing the number of incoming links between the two pages. How to fix it?
<ol>
<li>Use a .htaccess 301 Permanent Redirect to redirect all the non-www traffic to the www version. Open and edit the .htaccess file with the following lines:<br />
<blockquote><p>Options +FollowSymLinks<br />
RewriteEngine on<br />
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^mysite.com [NC]<br />
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.mysite.com/$1 [L,R=301]</p></blockquote>
</li>
<li>If you have a Google webmasters account, you can set a preferred domain for indexing (with or without www).</li>
</ol>
</li>
</ul>
<p><br/><br />
<b>Duplicate content across websites.</b><br />
There are two external SEO techniques used in web site promotion that create duplicate content: articles publishing and content syndication (i.e. RSS feeds on blogs). While these are useful in promoting your website, you must be careful with the duplicate content issues that may arise:</p>
<ul>
<li> Make sure, if possible, that each site that displays your articles or on which your content is syndicated includes a link back to your original article or blog entry.</li>
<li> Create short-versions or modified versions of your articles (around 60-70% modified text) and use them for articles publishing instead of the original articles</li>
<li> Don&#8217;t copy text from others (that&#8217;s an easy one!) <img src='http://www.webdev77.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </li>
<li> Use duplicate detection tools to find out who&#8217;s copying your content and if they are not allowed to do it, file a complaint with the search engines. For Google use this link: <a class="html" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.google.com/dmca.html" target= "_blank">file a DMCA request</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>Duplicate Content Tools</h3>
<ol>
<li> CopyScape.com is a well-known website that offers services to detect and protect your content against online plagiarism. Go to <a class="html" href="http://www.copyscape.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">www.copyscape.com</a> and enter the URL of your web site or web page. The script will look and retrieve similar pages.</li>
<p><br/></p>
<li> DuplicateContent.net has another useful tool that allows you to compare two web pages and calculates the degree of HTML tags and text similarity between them. Use the duplicate content detector below to check for duplicate content:</li>
</ol>
<div align="center">
<form method="post" action="http://www.duplicatecontent.net"><label for="url1"><a href="http://www.duplicatecontent.net" rel="”nofollow”" target="_blank" title="Check for duplicate content">Duplicate Content Detector</a></label><br/><br />
Link/WebPage #1<br />
<input name="url1" id="url1" accesskey="1" value="http://" type="text" /><br/><br />
Link/WebPage #2<br />
<input name="url2" id="url2" accesskey="2" value="http://" type="text" /><br/></p>
<input name="submit" value="Check URL" id="i0" type="submit" />
</form>
</div>
<p><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webdev77.com/seo-tips-and-tricks-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Big 2</title>
		<link>http://www.webdev77.com/the-big-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.webdev77.com/the-big-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bogdan Enache</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engines News & SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market share]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdev77.com/2008/02/01/the-big-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Big 3
When it comes to search engines and search engine optimization, most of the people refer to the search engines as&#8221;the big 3&#8243;, because the majority of the searches are done via the big three search engines: Google, Yahoo! and MSN. Although Google is #1 with a very comfortable lead in market share (it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>The Big 3</h3>
<p>When it comes to search engines and search engine optimization, most of the people refer to the search engines as&#8221;the big 3&#8243;, because the majority of the searches are done via the big three search engines: Google, Yahoo! and MSN. Although Google is #1 with a very comfortable lead in market share (it already controls nearly 60 percent of the U.S. search market), MSN and especially Yahoo! are still &#8220;players&#8221; in the market.</p>
<h3><img src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/ww/beta/y3.gif" alt="yahoo_logo" border="0" height="44" width="232" /></h3>
<h3>The Big 2?</h3>
<p>Despite broader economic worries about an economic slowdown and a drop in online traffic, Microsoft (the owner of MSN) is attempting the biggest-ever technology takeover. Today (February 1, 2008), Microsoft Corp. has proposed Yahoo Inc. an unsolicited takeover offer of $44.6 billion in an attempt to compete with Google in a market that may almost double to $80 billion by 2010. The offer includes a 62 percent premium to Yahoo&#8217;s closing stock price on Thursday, January 31, 2008. This is not the first time Microsoft Corp. tries to takeover Yahoo! Inc.; one year ago, Microsoft&#8217;s offer was rebuffed by Terry Semel who just resigned as Yahoo!&#8217;s chairman.</p>
<p>Steve Ballmer, Microsoft&#8217;s CEO wrote:<br />
<em>&#8220;Microsoft&#8217;s consistent belief has been that the combination of Microsoft and Yahoo! clearly represents the best way to deliver maximum value to our respective shareholders, as well as create a more efficient and competitive company that would provide greater value and service to our customers &#8230;&#8221;</em></p>
<p>No matter how this goes, I&#8217;ll just stick a note on my monitor to make sure I will not forget &#8230;</p>
<p class="important">Note to self:<br />
<span class="caps">Invent something that can be later sold for around 46 billion</span></p>
<hr width="80%" />
<h5>Update February 2nd, 2008:</h5>
<p>How is Yahoo! responding to the unsolicited bid? Here is a comment from the FAQ issued by Yahoo press:</p>
<p><i>The Yahoo! Board is undertaking a deliberate review process. They’re going to take time to thoroughly evaluate the proposal in the context of Yahoo!&#8217;s strategic plans. This will include evaluating all of the Company’s strategic alternatives – including maintaining Yahoo! as an independent company. That process will take some time, but the Board will ultimately pursue the option that it believes can best maximize value for our shareholders.</i></p>
<h5>Update February 3rd, 2008:</h5>
<p>What is Google&#8217;s position on the issue? Here is a comment from the official Google blog:</p>
<p><i>&#8230; Microsoft&#8217;s hostile bid for Yahoo! raises troubling questions. This is about more than simply a financial transaction, one company taking over another. It&#8217;s about preserving the underlying principles of the Internet: openness and innovation. &#8230; We take Internet openness, choice and innovation seriously. They are the core of our culture. We believe that the interests of Internet users come first &#8212; and should come first &#8212; as the merits of this proposed acquisition are examined and alternatives explored.</i></p>
<h5>Update February 9th, 2008:</h5>
<p>Yahoo has rejected Microsoft&#8217;s $44.6 billion offer. The Wall Street Journal reports that:</p>
<p><i>&#8230; a Yahoo source says that the Board felt that Microsoft was trying to &#8220;steal&#8221; the company. The same source stated that Yahoo wouldn&#8217;t consider an offer below $40 per share which would cost Microsoft another $12 billion.</i></p>
<h5>Update February 11th, 2008:</h5>
<p>Microsoft responds to Yahoo:</p>
<p><i>It is unfortunate that Yahoo! has not embraced our full and fair proposal to combine our companies. &#8230; The Yahoo! response does not change our belief in the strategic and financial merits of our proposal. As we have said previously, Microsoft reserves the right to pursue all necessary steps to ensure that Yahoo!’s shareholders are provided with the opportunity to realize the value inherent in our proposal.</i></p>
<h5>Update February 19th, 2008:</h5>
<p>In an escalation of its fight for Yahoo, Microsoft will authorize a proxy fight at the Internet company this week, people briefed on the matter told <a rel="nofollow" href="http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/19/microsoft-to-authorize-proxy-fight-at-yahoo/" target="_blank">DealBook</a>. Unless Yahoo quickly reverses course and enters into talks, Microsoft would then seek to nominate a slate of directors to Yahoo’s board by March 13, the final deadline for nominations, and pursue a lengthy campaign to oust the board.</p>
<p>The move, expected to cost about $20 million to $30 million, was Microsoft’s alternative to raising its $44.6 billion bid and is seen as a less expensive way to put pressure on Yahoo’s board. Yahoo rejected Microsoft’s original offer as undervalued.</p>
<p>To be continued &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.webdev77.com/the-big-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
