<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Password field &#8230; dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webdev77.com/is-the-password-field-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webdev77.com/is-the-password-field-dead/</link>
	<description>WebDev77, your online source for news, comments and articles on Web Hosting, Internet marketing, SEO techniques and Web development and design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:52:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bogdan Enache</title>
		<link>http://www.webdev77.com/is-the-password-field-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-8582</link>
		<dc:creator>Bogdan Enache</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 21:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdev77.com/is-the-password-field-dead/#comment-8582</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea about the brain wanting to see what it wants to see and not what is typed. If that&#039;s the case, we might have a reason to keep the password tag alive ... but besides that I see no other reason why we need to mask out what is typed.

I mean no other reason why we should use a password tag instead of just a plain text tag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea about the brain wanting to see what it wants to see and not what is typed. If that&#8217;s the case, we might have a reason to keep the password tag alive &#8230; but besides that I see no other reason why we need to mask out what is typed.</p>
<p>I mean no other reason why we should use a password tag instead of just a plain text tag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.webdev77.com/is-the-password-field-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-7780</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdev77.com/is-the-password-field-dead/#comment-7780</guid>
		<description>Interesting idea but maybe there&#039;s a place for a more sophisticated password field instead?!  On iPhone a password field shows the letter for a fraction of a second then it turns to a dot.  Other interfaces allow you to toggle between masked and unmasked.  Both these retain privacy but with a way to validate as you go.  One other flaw in your idea...many sites have two fields to type your email address and validate that too - and those are plain text.  The trouble is that the brain sees what it wants to see, not necessarily what is typed!  Having said all that, I&#039;m on your side that multiple fields and validation is a complete pain...maybe we could all go biometric?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting idea but maybe there&#8217;s a place for a more sophisticated password field instead?!  On iPhone a password field shows the letter for a fraction of a second then it turns to a dot.  Other interfaces allow you to toggle between masked and unmasked.  Both these retain privacy but with a way to validate as you go.  One other flaw in your idea&#8230;many sites have two fields to type your email address and validate that too &#8211; and those are plain text.  The trouble is that the brain sees what it wants to see, not necessarily what is typed!  Having said all that, I&#8217;m on your side that multiple fields and validation is a complete pain&#8230;maybe we could all go biometric?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
